We did form initially with the goal to facilitate collaboration of contributors and reduce overhead of non-members. It was basically a formation agreement with Foundation, with one floated alternative being to form some independent team.
We are not aiming to be as simple as most WG - in the pattern of 1 meeting every 1-2 weeks, so which meetings to broadcast seems a little more difficult.
Notify of this meeting ahead of time via User Committee DL seems first decision
Andy already sent response to clear up possible confusion over openness of meeting minutes and other LCOO Notes.
3 min
Co-chair nomination - Is this a good time to have a chair or co-chair other than AT&T. if so nominate and
- Related but even deeper: Perhaps update to our Charter and start elections. If it's the right time - perhaps a sub-tem to take it offline.
Jamey
10 min
In 1/26 Roadmap bi-monthly meeting which had attendance from AT&T, Intel, Reliance Jio and SKT, It was suggested for better attendance to meet in US morning times. Related: Communication Plan drafted here. Some possible debate points:
what do we want the composition of these teams to be (seems we want Global) and if so is Asia daytime needed to promote that?
Is it working? Perhaps we need Asia companies to commit and perhaps lead at these times.
if we want to support global membership are there better means to coordinate schedules commitment and notification to attend for the US staff