Resolve recent LCOO communication questions and suggestions
Set Activities and Milestones for Boston Summit Queens Forum/Scope submission
Discussion items
https://one.ubuntu.com/
Time
Item
Who
Notes
5 min
Openness of our meeting approach. We had a complaint to and reminder from the User Committee that our approach seemed less than open. Determine what change is needed reference: 2017-02-02 LCOO Coordinators Debate points/Options:
We did form initially with the goal to facilitate collaboration of contributors and reduce overhead for non-members. It was basically a formation agreement with Foundation, with one floated alternative being to form some independent team.
Proposed: Change open up the company profiles section to all. -1 -1 -1
Proposed: Clarification to UC about restricted pages (Security thing) and sub-teams +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
Proposed: Do not refer to restricted pages from non-restricted or put disclaimer at this point +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
Proposed: Notify of this (every 2 weeks coordinators) meeting ahead of time via User Committee DL and include link to list of all meetings: Meeting notes. Publish/Announce all standing meetings, so both our main meeting and the roadmap team meetings would be announced in email. +1 { +1 +1 +1
Jamey McCabe to send a response to the User Committee
We are not aiming to be as simple as most WG - in the pattern of 1 meeting every 1-2 weeks, so which meetings to broadcast seems a little more difficult.
Notify of Roadmap meetings ahead of time? (these are every 2 weeks)
Andy already sent response to clear up possible confusion over openness of meeting minutes and other LCOO Notes.
Jamey McCabe to announce LCOO Coordinators meeting (main meeting) in advance via the User Committee email list each time
Jamey, Edgar, Shilla, Andy
3 min
Co-chair nomination - Is this a good time to have a chair or co-chair other than AT&T. if so nominate and
- Related but even deeper: Perhaps update to our Charter and start elections. If it's the right time - perhaps a sub-tem to take it offline.
Jamey
10 min
In 1/26 Roadmap bi-monthly meeting which had attendance from AT&T, Intel, Reliance Jio and SKT, It was suggested for better attendance to meet in US morning times. +1 Related: Communication Plan drafted here. Some possible debate points:
what do we want the composition of these teams to be (seems we want Global) and if so is Asia daytime needed to promote that?
Is it working? Perhaps we need Asia companies to commit and perhaps lead at these times.
if we want to support global membership are there better means to coordinate schedules commitment and notification to attend for the US staff
Proposed: Coordinator meetings should happen US Morning time +1
if it is not between midnight and 6am here in Korea. +1
Proposed: Roadmap meetings determined in next weeks meeting +1
How are we positioning ourselves in relation to the OpenStack product working group?
Do we need to form a sub-team to plan and act on this?
Do we want a Working Group session for LCOO in Boston? We do have this reqeusted already - Shill did it - I (jamey) see it on my request list. Fantastic!!
Proposed: Joint presentations to introduce LCOO For example, in Barcelona the new (refurbished?) Telecom/NFV Functional Team had sessions to introduce themselves (or so it seemed?)
Proposed: Birds of a feather session for LCOO +1 Jamey volunteers to request this
Milestones and Action Items leading to Queen's Forum
Intel Items Update (Sonu Sreenivasan is joining the call to give an intel update on the 4 items)
Containerization of Control Plane - Kolla. White Paper to available soon.
Zero downtime upgrade for Core 6 and Ironic (Starting with Ocata and onward). Relted to Rollign Upgrades
Scale Testing of Core 6 projects at 500 nodes for reliability for specific reference workloads and deployment architecture with injected failures. Looking for feedback on workload and architecture from LCOO
MOP Documentation for Ease of Installing Openstack using Ansible and Kolla