Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 10 Next »

Date

at UTC 1400: | http://bit.ly/2k5ja6k | LCOO Roadmap Coordinators170209.ics

Meeting Link to join: https://join.att.com/meet/jm6819/KPWSCJ58 

Join by phone Toll Free : 8443439499 (USA, Global) Conference ID: 87579340  Forgot your dial-in PIN? |Help  

Attendees

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes

Review PWG "Story" Process: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ProductTeam/User_Stories#User_Story_Workflow

https://github.com/openstack/openstack-user-stories/tree/master/user-stories/proposed

https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/openstack-user-stories.git;a=tree;f=user-stories/proposed

  • More detail here: OpenStack Release Planning Calendar
  • Question: Should we follow this process in all cases where there is a significant cross-project impact? What if we have the resources to drive it completely by ourselves end to end?
  • PWG "User Story Tracker" challenge and sub-team



Discuss "LCOO Roadmap"

What should be considered part of our LCOO roadmap and what should not? For example, ATT is driving Gluon, but if no other members are interested in that should it be considered part of an "LCOO" roadmap? Or is it just part of personal ATT's roadmap?

What do we want to really collaborate on? Different levels:

  1. Sharing awareness, seeking feedback
  2. Sharing in requirements definition and/or coding
  3. Actual mutual ownership of a significant cross-project initiative (via PWG Process)

Discuss: What is our Identity? How do we work with other working groups?  How do we differentiate ourselves from the Large Deployment Team, the Telco/NFV Team, the Enterprise WG, Massively Distributed Cloud WG, etc?



Possible Action Items:

  • Decisions? - Do we want to start with individual FSTs immediately? or do we want to decide on a few specific features and then form the FSTs?



PWG asked us to consider taking the Logging Story:


Do we want to pursue this any further?

Are there other things people would like propose we collaborate on? Shintaro Mizuno (Unlicensed) Destructive testing?? Disruptive testing story is already proposed and merged! (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396142/)

Next steps?



Possible Action Items:

  • Next Steps

Review/demo JIRA configuration.

Seek consensus around how we will use it.



Possible Action Items:

  • Additional Admins?
  • Provide each company with one or more JIRA project spaces
  • Start entering what each company is working on in JIRA

Share PTG Plans

  • Attendees, focus, priorities and contact info
  • Want to connect people
  • Want to understand Members priorities and support one another


Possible Action Items:

  • Create a page for all to post this info?
Optional as time allowsSet Proposed Milestones and Action Items:  
  • date ______  FST's kicked off
  • date ______ Individual Member's Epics/Stories in their JIRA projects
  • date ______ Commit to Joint Initiative ("Story") with PWG
  • date ______ Joint Initiative ("Story") Epics/Stories in JIRA
  • date ______  'Publish' LCOO Roadmap for Queens

Other Important Dates:

  • 3/13 Meet with PWG in Milan? 
  • 3/ 27 Submit Forum time slot requests


Optional as time allows

(Maybe for the Larger Governance call)

Summit plans update:

  • "Birds of a Feather" session - To introduce LCOO and what we're all about to the Community
  • Meetings at the Summit







Action items

  •  
  • No labels