...
- here in Atlassian Wiki for the formal agenda and notes and action items.
- for audio and video interaction Join Skype Meeting Trouble Joining? Try Skype Web App Join by phone 8443439499 (USA, Global) Conference ID: 3747438 | Help
- IRC: for those who cannot join via audio or prefer the english text/ability to translate we also use IRC. It is scheduled to the #openstack-meeting channel at this time.
Attendees
Goals
Discussion items
| Item | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Special Announcement: To accomodate organizations wishing to join for who English is not a typical language, agreed to also join IRC and carry on meeting in both locations. Trial approach, to some extent counts on those in audio bridge to also carry on parallel conversation in IRC. Have scheduled the #openstack-meeting IRC channel at this time. iF nothing else try to join via http://freenode.com | ||
| 1 | Specialization Status/Next Steps for Collaboration | ||
| 1.1 | Extreme Testing - good meeting in Mexico City and ongoing discussion in ML: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/. Plans being made to attend PTG in September: | ||
| 2 | LCOO General Coordination | ||
| 2.1 | Announcements - Standing agenda Item - Chance for attendees to briefly educate/celebrate
| AT&T will have ~12 people at the PTG. NTT will have 5 people at PTG Intel will have ~12 at PTG Shintaro is going to OpenDev (Also my boss Masahisa Kawashima is going) AT&T will have Kandan Kathirvel, Alan Meadows and Rodolfo Pacheco at OpenDev and helping lead | |
| 2.2 | Plans to have a organization stakeholders session August 31: (Late evening in US). This is in essence a 1 year anniversary and review for the LCOO members management stakeholders. Let Jamey McCabe know if you want to join. | NTT will update on the latest topics around Software Defined Infrastructure including Edge computing. Yaguo has said that he would like to join. | |
| 2.4 | Discussion: The Future of LCOO. With a full year behind us, has the mission/vision for LCOO changed? Should we revise our charter? How will changes in the Community like SIG's affect us? We've seen changes in membership. Lets spend some time as Organizers to debate options and thus set our stakeholders up for a better conversation.
| Comment by Andrew Ukasick: If we made regular updates from members about what their companies are working on in the Community a deliberate part of our agendas, then we could look for synergies and connect the people who are working on those things. That's what happened with 'Extreme Testing'. I was able to find some people internally who were already working on the same problem that NTT was and get them connected. Perhaps we could have rotating (maybe monthly?) updates from each company taking turns at presenting what their priorities are, what they're working on in the Community, etc. I think that could attract broader participation both internally and from more companies. | |