Versions Compared

Old Version 23

changes.mady.by.user Andy Ukasick

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Andrew Ukasick

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

at UTC 500:  http://bit.ly/2jZ6Qbg

2017-.01-.26 Roadmap Coordinator Meeting notes

Meeting Link: https://join.att.com/meet/au3678/ZP7B80FR 

Attendees

Goals

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
10Recap of the meeting with Carol BennetAll

It was suggested for better attendance to meet in US morning times? Ask the group for the best meeting time suggestions.

  • The rolling  upgrade  feature may be a good example to run through the PWG process
  • Cross project sessions occur at the Forum
  • There is a Logging user story (error codes) already under development that would be a good example for the LCOO  to  review and refine further
10

Difference between Summit and Forum: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum

Discuss presentation ideas for Boston Summit: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/call-for-presentations/

  • What is value we bring the community?
  • What messages do we want to convey?
  • How are we positioning ourselves in relation to the OpenStack product working group? 
Jamey

Deferred to the next meeting owing to low attendance in this meeting

  • Working group session in Boston - need  to submit by 2/6
10

High level LCOO JIRA Demo

Discuss/Review LCOO JIRA usage options

Schedule side meeting to take a deeper dive into jira,training, administration, etc.

Discuss whether we should have individual boards for each company or a consolidated board for the LCOO

Andy

the Roadmap committee to nominate 2 more people to help out on JIRA administration

  • JIRA is beneficial to manage cross projects
  • JIRA has the ability to create themes, EPICs, stories, tasks etc.
  • Roadblocks can be ascertained through comments input by Developers, e.g. waiting for +2
  • JIRA may not be the right option in all instances, but is  beneficial for driving work together and exposing where members need assistance, e.g. need help with a review etc.
 10Discuss meetings for Intel to share OSIC Roadmap objectives in depth broken down by functional areas  link: https://osic.org/roadmap
10

Discuss FST's (roadmap sub-teams)

Should we first try to outline a basic roadmap? or Should we jump into smaller FSTs and get multiple threads started in parallel?

Perhaps pick one "Story" and run it through the PWG Process

Aditya

Development community needs highly detailed specs and blueprints which is an outcome of a user story discussion and a subsequent extensive Gaps analysis discussion.

This can be driven by collaboration with PWG as well. 

  • A key question to be answered on user stories is who is the user story supporting and why should it  be implemented.
10Mention the JIRA focused side meeting later in the day: 2017-.01-.26 Roadmap Logistics Sub-team Meeting notes

10Discuss how/when to follow-up on the /wiki/spaces/LCOO/pages/6193156

Action items

  •  Yih Leong Sun (Deactivated)Leong to contact Sundar and ask that we defer osic roadmap meetings until after we can discuss at next lcoo meeting
  •  Andrew Ukasick to create JIRA projects
  •  Jamey McCabe Add an FST discussion to the next LCOO Agenda
  •  Andrew Ukasick to send out next meeting invitation
  •  the Roadmap committee to nominate 2 more people to help out on JIRA administration
  •