Page Comparison

Decision: Clarification to UC about restricted pages (Security thing) and sub-teams → Jamey McCabe Action item.  Draft: The LCOO is committed (and motivated as we want to influence and participate in the entire community, to have our progress be in the public.  As we do share with each other non-public company matters for the purpose of Roadmap consolidation we have some materials that individual members create that are not public.  From an  organization security perspective we need to be able to keep these limited to their intended audience and auditable as to who is viewing. These materials will not be open to the public in the Atlassian Confluence Wiki.  Will will make every attempt to be open as to when we do refer to such materials.

Decision: Notify of this and Roadmap (every 2 weeks coordinators meeting) ahead of time via User Committee DL and include link to list of all meetings.  Meeting invites/notes. In essence this will be a weekly communication from LCOO on the User Committee DL,  :  → Jamey McCabe and Andy/Aditya action item

Co-chair nomination - Is this a good time to have a chair or co-chair other than AT&T. if so nominate and 

 - Related but even deeper: Perhaps update to our Charter and start elections.  If it's the right time - perhaps a sub-tem to take it offline.

In 1/26 Roadmap bi-monthly meeting which had attendance from AT&T, Intel, Reliance Jio and SKT, It was suggested for better attendance to meet in US morning times. +1  Related: Communication Plan drafted here.  Some possible debate points:

• what do we want the composition of these teams to be (seems we want Global) and if so is Asia daytime needed to promote that?
• Is it working? Perhaps we need Asia companies to commit and perhaps lead at these times.
• if we want to support global membership are there better means to coordinate schedules commitment and notification to attend for the US staff
  • Proposed: Coordinator meetings should happen US Morning time +1
    • if it is not between midnight and 6am here in Korea. +1
  • Proposed: Roadmap meetings determined in next weeks meeting +1
• would IRC (versus voice/video) be helpful +1
• would publishing the meeting on Youtube be good.  See example of Helm project team:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b83bVArDuEg

Decision: Will stick with the UTC:1400 for coordiantors meetings.  To see this in pictoral for the timezones of all members see picture at the bottom of LCOO Communication Plan

Decision: For subteam meetings, though they have the guidance of the Communication plan and thus proposed UTC0500 and UTC1400 times they should determine for themselves if, how often, when and even via what mechanism (verbal meeting or IRC)  makes sense. These meetings would also be tracked via Meeting invites/notes page so others in the community would not be excluded.

Intel Items Update (Sonu Sreenivasan is joining the call to give an intel update on the 4 items)

• 1. Containerization of Control Plane - Kolla.  White Paper to available soon.
  2. Zero downtime upgrade for Core 6  and Ironic (Starting with Ocata and onward). Relted to Rollign Upgrades
   
  1. Scale Testing of Core 6 projects at 500 nodes for reliability for specific reference workloads and deployment architecture with injected failures.
    Looking
  1. Jamey spoke to haw this seems realted to proposed 1000 node User Story requested of LCOO.  Sonu clarified that Intel is looking for feedback on workload and architecture from LCOO for this effort.
  2. MOP Documentation for Ease of Installing Openstack using Ansible and Kolla