Page Comparison

1. We did form initially with the goal to facilitate collaboration of contributors and reduce overhead for non-members.  It was basically a formation agreement with Foundation, with one floated alternative being to form some independent team.
2. 1. Proposed: Change open up the company profiles section to all. -1 -1 -1
   2. Proposed: Clarification to UC about restricted pages (Security thing) and sub-teams +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
   3. Proposed: Do not refer to restricted pages from non-restricted or put disclaimer at this point +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
   4. Proposed: Move to IRC  +1
   5. Proposed: publish meetings in Youtube: See example of Helm project team:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b83bVArDuEg -1
   6. Proposed: Notify of this (every 2 weeks coordinators) meeting ahead of time via User Committee DL and include link to list of all meetings: Meeting notes.  Publish/Announce all standing meetings, so both our main meeting and the roadmap team meetings would be announced in email.  +1 {  +1  +1 +1
   •  Jamey McCabe to send a response to the User Committee
   •  Andrew Ukasick to revise

Proposed: Technical Meeting every other week  Decide on this in next roadmap meeting

•  Andrew Ukasick and Aditya Mani to include in the next Roadmap team agenda
  

1. We are not aiming to be as simple as most WG - in the pattern of 1 meeting every 1-2 weeks, so which meetings to broadcast seems a little more difficult.
2. Notify

1. of Roadmap meetings ahead of time

1. ? (these are every 2 weeks)
2. Andy already sent response to clear up possible confusion over openness of meeting minutes and other LCOO Notes.

•  Andrew Ukasick and Aditya Mani to announce roadmap team meetings in advance via the User Committee email list each time
•  Jamey McCabe to announce LCOO Coordinators meeting (main meeting) in advance via the User Committee email list each time

Co-chair nomination - Is this a good time to have a chair or co-chair other than AT&T. if so nominate and 

 - Related but even deeper: Perhaps update to our Charter and start elections.  If it's the right time - perhaps a sub-tem to take it offline.

In 1/26 Roadmap bi-monthly meeting which had attendance from AT&T, Intel, Reliance Jio and SKT, It was suggested for better attendance to meet in US morning times.

+1  Related: Communication Plan drafted here.  Some possible debate points:

• what do we want the composition of these teams to be (seems we want Global) and if so is Asia daytime needed to promote that?
• Is it working? Perhaps we need Asia companies to commit and perhaps lead at these times.
• if we want to support global membership are there better means to coordinate schedules commitment and notification to attend for the US staff
  • Proposed: Coordinator meetings should happen US Morning time +1
    • if it is not between midnight and 6am here in Korea. +1
  • Proposed: Roadmap meetings determined in next weeks meeting +1
• would IRC (versus voice/video) be helpful +1
• would publishing the meeting on Youtube be good.  See example of Helm project team:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b83bVArDuEg

Difference between Summit and Forum: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum

(DEADLINE FEB 6) Discuss presentation ideas for Boston Summit: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/call-for-presentations/

• What is value we bring the community?
• What messages do we want to convey?
• How are we positioning ourselves in relation to the OpenStack product working group?
• Do we need to form a sub-team to plan and act on this?
• Do we want a Working Group session for LCOO in Boston? We do have this reqeusted already - Shill did it - I (jamey) see it on my request list. Fantastic!!

Proposed: Joint presentations to introduce LCOO  For example, in Barcelona the new (refurbished?) Telecom/NFV Functional Team had sessions to introduce themselves (or so it seemed?)

Proposed: Birds of a feather session for LCOO +1 Jamey volunteers to request this

Milestones and Action Items leading to Queen's Forum

https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/

• 2/6 FST's kicked off
• 2/20 FST Roadmap for Queens
• 3/6 Draft User Stories
  • Logging User Story asked by PWG to LCOO
  • Disruptive testing story is already proposed and merged! (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396142/)
• 3/13 Meet with PWG
• 3/ 27 Submit Forum time slot requests

•  Andrew Ukasick, Megan Rossetti, Jaesuk Ahn, Jamey McCabe to submit a proposal for doing a regular presentation and a "birds of a feather" presentation to introduce LCOO to the Community at the Boston Summit. Megan Rossetti to prepare a draft.
  

Intel Items Update (Sonu Sreenivasan is joining the call to give an intel update on the 4 items)

• 1. Containerization of Control Plane - Kolla.  White Paper to available soon.
  2. Zero downtime upgrade for Core 6  and Ironic (Starting with Ocata and onward). Relted to Rollign Upgrades
  •  Scale Testing of Core 6 projects at 500 nodes for

• • reliability for

• • specific reference workloads and deployment architecture with injected failures.  Looking for feedback on workload and architecture from LCOO
  1. MOP Documentation for Ease of Installing Openstack using Ansible and Kolla