Page Comparison

1. We did form initially with the goal to facilitate collaboration of contributors and reduce overhead of for non-members.  It was basically a formation agreement with Foundation, with one floated alternative being to form some independent team.
2. We are not aiming to be as simple as most WG - in the pattern of 1 meeting every 1-2 weeks, so which meetings to broadcast seems a little more difficult.
3. Notify of this meeting ahead of time via User Committee DL seems first decision
4. Andy already sent response to clear up possible confusion over openness of meeting minutes and other LCOO Notes.   

Co-chair nomination - Is this a good time to have a chair or co-chair other than AT&T. if so nominate and 

 - Related but even deeper: Perhaps update to our Charter and start elections.  If it's the right time - perhaps a sub-tem to take it offline.

In 1/26 Roadmap bi-monthly meeting which had attendance from AT&T, Intel, Reliance Jio and SKT, It was suggested for better attendance to meet in US morning times.  Related: Communication Plan drafted here.  Some possible debate points:

• what do we want the composition of these teams to be (seems we want Global) and if so is Asia daytime needed to promote that?
• Is it working? Perhaps we need Asia companies to commit and perhaps lead at these times.
• if we want to support global membership are there better means to coordinate schedules commitment and notification to attend for the US staff
• would IRC (versus voice/video) be helpful
• would publishing the meeting on Youtube be good.  See example of Helm project team:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b83bVArDuEg

Difference between Summit and Forum: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum

(DEADLINE FEB 6) Discuss presentation ideas for Boston Summit: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/call-for-presentations/

• What is value we bring the community?
• What messages do we want to convey?
• How are we positioning ourselves in relation to the OpenStack product working group?
• Do we need to form a sub-team to plan and act on this?

Proposed: Joint presentations to introduce LCOO  For example, in Barcelona the new (refurbished?) Telecom/NFV Functional Team had sessions to introduce themselves (or so it seemed?)

Milestones and Action Items leading to Queen's Forum

https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/

• 2/6 FST's kicked off
• 2/20 FST Roadmap for Queens
• 3/6 Draft User Stories
• 3/13 Meet with PWG
• 3/ 27 Submit Forum time slot requests

Intel Items Update (Sonu Sreenivasan is joining the call to give an intel update on the 4 items)

• 1. Containerization of Control Plane - Kolla
  2. Zero downtime upgrade for Core 6  and Ironic (Starting with Ocata and onward)
  3. Scale Testing of Core 6 projects at 500 nodes for reliablity for specifc referene workloads and deployment architecture with injected failures.
  4. MOP Documentation for Ease of Installing Openstack using Ansible and Kolla